We review products independently, but we may earn affiliate commissions from buying links on this page. Terms of use.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H5

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H5

3.0 Good
 - Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H5
3.0 Good

Bottom Line

It's a nicely designed camera, but falls short in some key quality and performance areas.
  • Pros

    • Sharp photos.
    • Vibrant Color.
    • Nicely designed body.
    • Decent video clips.
  • Cons

    • Shutter lag.
    • Mediocre menus.
    • Flash is too powerful.

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H5 Specs

35mm Equivalent (Telephoto) 432 mm
35mm Equivalent (Wide) 36
Battery Type AA
Memory Card Format Memory Stick Duo
Sensor Resolution 7.2
Type Superzoom

On the surface, the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H5 has plenty of the allure that makes Sony cameras and camcorders popular: provocative design and a bunch of features that everybody seems to want. For example, the Sony H5 has a bright three-inch LCD and a whopping 12X optical zoom that gives you the feeling you've got all the photo control you'll ever need. Plus, the camera is equipped with image stabilization, a feature that lets you zoom into a scene without needing a tripod to keep your hand steady, at least in some situations. Still, it's not the stellar superzoom I had hoped for from Sony.

In my view, the H5 doesn't quite live up to its compelling design. Namely, I found some significant shutter lag as well as some fringing which keeps this shooter from getting a higher rating. Also, like most Sony models, it's pricey, at $499.95 list. Plus, the H5 is a little on the bulky side, which given Sony's love of making super tiny cameras, like the T50, is a bit surprising too.

In looking at the specs, the H5 doesn't stand out all that much from the pack: it's a 7.2-megapixel camera with a 6mm-to-72mm range (which is equivalent to a 35mm lens with a 36mm-432mm zoom) and corresponding maximum f-stops of f/2.8 to f/3.7. Sadly the lens doesn't have a wide-angle end of the zoom. Nor can the camera shoot in the RAW image format, although only a few high-end superzooms can. And although I liked the H5's ISO range–ISO 80 to ISO 1000, the shots I took at the top of that range had too much colored noise for my tastes.

But I did find a few things to like about this camera. I was definitely impressed with the H5's image quality. I've rarely been disappointed by the vibrant color I usually see in Sony digital cameras. I found video quality to be quite good, too. Even better, the 3-inch LCD doesn't solarize much when you look at it at an angle.

That said, Sony should have done more to update this camera from last year's H1: The company changed very little in its menu structure and design. With so many companies putting effort into this area—including Sony, at least in some of its newer camcorders—I find it disappointing to see the same old GUI here. At least Sony has added captions for the scene modes, which gives you a quick description of what those modes do.

In terms of performance, it would have been nice to have a more robust burst mode. For example, using the Canon PowerShot S3 IS, I could take a dozen shots in the burst mode before it stalled and cleared its buffer. On the H5, when I set the camera to its highest quality setting (meaning 7 mepapixels), I could only shoot about four or five frames and then had to wait a few seconds before I could resume shooting.

As I said, I was impressed with the video clips, which can be captured at VGA (640 by 480) quality at 30 fps to the capacity of the card. I also noticed that the H5 worked well in both bright and low light situations.

In my test shots, I didn't see much noise in any of the shots, even those taken at low ISOs. I really liked the color saturation in these images. There was a bit of purple fringing, but nothing too noticeable. And the flash shot produced a pretty good exposure, but it did blow out some highlights.

The H5's resolution averaged 1725 lines, which is excellent for a 7.2 MP camera. But performance could be better: Although the 3.4-second recycle time and 3.4-second bootup time are respectable, the noticeable shutter lag was disappointing.

Overall, the lens was quite good, displaying just a bit of barrel distortion and no pin cushion distortion. I also found that the optical image stabilization worked in both bright light and low light situations.

I think that for the same $499.95 list price, the Canon PowerShot S3 IS is a better buy. And if price is an issue, go for the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ7, which lists for $349.95

Compare the digital cameras mentioned above side by side

More digital camera reviews:

About Terry Sullivan