Skip to main content
Log in

A New Whalefish Species of the Genus Cetomimus (Cetomimidae) from the Tropical Part of the Central Atlantic

  • Published:
Journal of Ichthyology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new species of bathypelagic whalefishes of the genus Cetomimus is described; its two specimens were caught over the central tropical part of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge at the layers of 1500–0 and 2680–0 m. The species is characterized by the presence of 31/2 gill arches (with a small slit behind the third gill arch) and cavernous tissue developed only around the anus and above the bases of the first to sixth rays of the anal fin; large pores in the lateral line canal, which are approximately as wide as this canal; the absence of large, valve-shaped triangular outgrowths along the margin of septa between pores in the posterior part of the lateral line; 42–48 vertebrae; and 20, 17–18, and 18 rays in the pectoral, dorsal, and anal fins, respectively; 17–18 pores in the lateral line canal between the upper margin of the gill cover and the end of the caudal peduncle, as well as by some other diagnostic features. The first molecular genetic data for the described species (mtDNA COX-1 sequences, or DNA barcodes) and analysis of interspecific divergence in the genus Cetomimus are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Barcode of Life Data System V. 4 (https://www.boldsystems.org. Version 06/2022).

  2. NIH genetic sequence database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Version 06/2022).

  3. Geneious 10.2.2 (http://www.geneious.com. Version 06/2022).

  4. FigTree 1.4.3 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree. Version 05/2022).

  5. Hereinafter, the data are referred to the holotype (paratype in brackets).

REFERENCES

  1. Abe, T., Marumo, R., and Kawaguchi, K., Description of a new cetomimid fish from Suruga Bay, Jpn. J. Ichthyol., 1965, vol. 12, nos. 3–6, pp. 57–63. https://doi.org/10.11369/jji1950.12.57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Angulo, A., Cetomimus gillii Goode & Bean, 1895 (Cetomimiformes: Cetomimidae): range extension and first record in the Tropical Eastern Pacific, Mar. Biodivers. Rec., 2015, vol. 8, Article e22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755267215000019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bermingham, E., McCafferty, S., and Martin, A.P., Fish biogeography and molecular clocks: Perspectives from the Panamanian isthmus, in Molecular Systematics of Fishes, San Diego et al.: Acad. Press, 1997, pp. 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012417540-2/50009-9

  4. Brauer, A., Die Tiefsee-Fische. L. Systematischer Teil, Jena: G. Fischer, 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bucklin, A., Ortman, B.D., Jennings, R.M., et al., “A Rosetta Stone” for metazoan zooplankton: DNA barcode analysis of species diversity of the Sargasso Sea (Northwest Atlantic Ocean), Deep Sea Res., Part II. Top. Stud. Oceanogr., 2010, vol. 57, nos. 24–26, pp. 2234–2247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.09.025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Craddock, J.E. and Mead, G.W., Midwater fishes from The Eastern South Pacific Ocean, Sci. Res. Southeast Pac. Exped. Contribut. Anton Bruun Rept., 1970, no. 3, pp. 1–46.

  7. Drummond, A. and Rambaut, A., BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees, BMC Evol. Biol., 2007, vol. 7, Article 214. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-214

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Drummond, A.J., Suchard, M.A., Xie, D., et al. Bayesian Phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST v.1.7, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2012, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1969–1973. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Elz, A., Schwenke, P., and Park, L., NWFSC forensic marinefish voucher collection, Version 08/2022, 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/JQ354000.

  10. Gilchrist, J.D.F., Deep-sea fishes procured by the S.S. “Pickle” (Part I), Report of the Fisheries and Marine Biological Survey, Union of South Africa, 1922, no. 2, pp. 41–79.

  11. Hanner, R., Data standards for BARCODE records in INSDC (BRIs), in BARCODE Data Standards v.2.4, Version 08/2022, 2009, pp. 1–4. https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/96518/BARCODE%20Data%20-Standards%20v2.4.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

  12. Harry, R.R., Deep-sea fishes of the Bermuda Oceanographic Expeditions, families Cetomimidae and Rondeletiidae, Zoologica, 1952, vol. 37, pp. 55–72. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.184690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hebert, P.D.N., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L., et al., Biological identifications through DNA barcodes, 2003, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, vol. 270, no. 1512, pp. 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218

  14. Hebert, P.D.N., Stoeckle, M.Y., Tyler, S., et al., Identification of birds through DNA barcodes, PLoS Biol., 2004, vol. 2, no. 10, Article e312, pp. 1657–1663. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312

  15. Hubert, N., Hanner, R., Holm, E., et al., Identifying Canadian freshwater fishes through DNA barcodes, PLoS One, 2008, vol. 3, no. 6, Article e2490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, G.D., Paxton, J.R., Sutton, T.T., et al., Deep-sea mystery solved: Astonishing larval transformations and extreme sexual dimorphism unite three fish families, Biol. Lett., 2009, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 235–239. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0722

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kenchington, E.L., Baillie, S.M., Kenchington, T.J., et al., Barcoding Atlantic Canada’s mesopelagic and upper bathypelagic marine fishes, PLoS ONE, 2017, vol. 12, no. 9, Article e0185173. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kimura, M., A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences, J. Mol. Evol., 1980, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobyliansky, S.G., Gordeeva, N.V., Kotlyar, A.N., New Findings of the rare species Rondeletia bicolor (Stephanoberycoidei) over the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and some peculiarities of the Rondeletiidae family’s phylologeny, J. Ichthyol., 2020, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945220010075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kozlov, A.M., Darriba, D., Flouri, T., et al., RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable, and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference, Bioinformatics, 2019, vol. 35, no. 21, pp. 4453–4455. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Maul, G.E., On the genus Cetomimus (Cetomimidae) with the description of a new species, Bocagiana, 1969, no. 18, pp. 1–12.

  22. Meier, R., Shiyang, K., Vaidya, G., et al., DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: A tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success, Syst. Biol., 2006, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600969864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W., and Schwartz, T., Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees, in Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans: IEEE, 2010, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129

  24. Parr, A.E., Deep-sea fishes of the order Iniomi from the waters around the Bahama and Bermuda Islands, Bull. Bingham Oceanogr. Coll., 1928, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–193.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Paxton, J.R., Family Cetomimidae, in Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean, Paris: UNESCO, 1986, vol. 2, pp. 524–525.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Paxton, J.R., Synopsis of the whalefishes (family Cetomimidae) with descriptions of four new genera, Rec. Aust. Mus., 1989, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 135–206. https://doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.41.1989.141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paxton, J.R. and Bray, D.J., Order Cetomimiformes, in Smiths’ Sea Fishes, Berlin: Springer, 1986, pp. 433–434.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paxton, J.R., Trnski, T., and Johnson, G.D., Cetomimidae, in The Living Marine Resources of the Eastern Central Atlantic, Rome: FAO, 2016, vol. 3, pp. 2174–2182.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pereira, L.H., Hanner, R., Foresti, F., et al., Can DNA barcoding accurately discriminate megadiverse Neotropical freshwater fish fauna?, BMC Genet., 2013, vol. 14, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-14-20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Posada, D., jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging, Mol. Biol. Evol., 2008, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1253–1256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Puillandre, N., Lambert, A., S. Brouillet S., et al., ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primaryspecies delimitation, Mol. Ecol., 2012, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1864–1877. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05239.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., Xie, D., et al., Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7, Systematic Biol., 2018, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 907–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sahu, S.K., Singh, R., and Kathiresan, K., Multi-gene phylogenetic analysis reveals the multiple origin and evolution of mangrove physiological traits through exaptation, Estuar. Coast. Shelf. Sci., 2016, vol. 183, pt. A, pp. 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2016.10.021

  34. Tolley, S.G., Gartner, J.V., and Lancraft, T.M., Whalefishes (Beryciformes: Cetomimoidei) of the gulf of Mexico, Bull. Mar. Sci., 1989, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 671–677.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Villesen, P., FaBox: an online toolbox for FASTA sequences, Mol. Ecol. Notes, 2007, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 965–968. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01821.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ward, R.D., DNA barcode divergence among species and genera of birds and fishes, Mol. Ecol. Res., 2009, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1077–1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02541.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ward, R.D., Zemlak, T.S., Innes, B.H., et al., DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B., 2005, vol. 360, no. 1462, pp. 1847–1857. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1716

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang, J., Kapli, P., Pavlidis, P., et al., A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements, Bioinformatics, 2013, vol. 29, no. 22, pp. 2869–2876. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was performed as part of State Assignment FMWE-2021-0008.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. G. Kobyliansky.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Translated by D. Zabolotny

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kobyliansky, S.G., Gordeeva, N.V. & Mishin, A.V. A New Whalefish Species of the Genus Cetomimus (Cetomimidae) from the Tropical Part of the Central Atlantic. J. Ichthyol. 63, 395–407 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945223030074

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0032945223030074

Keywords:

Navigation