New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
unable to execute after installation #46
Comments
It is definitely a bug and is related to the definition of the examples folder path. The way to solve it without much effort is to define the path explicitly and absolutely, that is, you must define the full path (eg. |
Hi,
I could run the test. It passed. Thanks for the help.
Now for my own system, a protein-peptide one, I am getting error. I think I
am getting the error due to forcefield as I have run my simulations using
charmm36/charmm36m.
Please advise me how to change the mmpbsa.in file. Currently the default
mmpbsa.in file contains an expression "oldff/leaprc.ff99SB" in the
forcefield option.
Thanks,
Suman.
…On Sat 12 Jun, 2021, 10:22 PM Mario Sergio Valdés Tresanco, < ***@***.***> wrote:
It is definitely a bug and is related to the definition of the examples
folder path. The way to solve it without much effort is to define the path
explicitly and absolutely, that is, you must define the full path (eg. gmx_MMPBSA_test
-f /home/mario/). A relative path will end in an error similar to this
(eg. gmx_MMPBSA_test -f [ . , ./Documents , not define any path, etc])
We will solve it in the next release. Thank you for reported it
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#46 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUOPBA7FC4ZAG7P7WA4FWFLTSOGEPANCNFSM46SBRNJA>
.
|
The error should not be related to the |
Hi,
I have restarted the calculation (not serial and not MPI as my current
gromacs 2020.2 is not an MPI version) with the given instructions for
charmmff in your website. It is running now without any errors.
So is it taking only one processor to do the calculations? My system is of
53765 atoms and I have taken 51 frames for mmpbsa calculation.
Approximately how much time it should take?
Thanks,
Suman.
…On Wed 16 Jun, 2021, 11:52 AM Mario Sergio Valdés Tresanco, < ***@***.***> wrote:
The error should not be related to the forcefields variable since this
variable only applies when it comes to Amber's force fields. When the ff is
CHARMM (any version), the generation of Amber's topologies is by conversion
(You can check this information here
<https://valdes-tresanco-ms.github.io/gmx_MMPBSA/howworks/>).
Please attach the gmx_MMPBSA.log file or the Traceback shown in the
terminal to be able to identify the error
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#46 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUOPBAZZ4DIFRZQXFVTUV6DTTA7JPANCNFSM46SBRNJA>
.
|
No serial and not MPI? what do you mean? It is difficult to know. Assuming that the 53765 atoms correspond to protein (the water molecules are not taken into account in the calculation since it is an implicit solvent, nor the ions) and using about 8 CPU it should take between 1-3 hours approximately (Considering that it is PB only if it is GB, it can take 3-5 times less. If you calculate Cheers |
The calculations were over by 40 minutes. But I am not getting neither the
IE nor the delta G-binding term, not showing in GMX-MMPBSA ana..So finally
what is the binding energy of this protein/peptide system?
Thanks,
Suman.
…On Wed 16 Jun, 2021, 1:01 PM Mario Sergio Valdés Tresanco, < ***@***.***> wrote:
No serial and not MPI? what do you mean?
gmx_MMPBSA is independent of GROMACS compilation. It works with MPI
independently, which can significantly reduce computing time. You can see
how to run it here
<https://valdes-tresanco-ms.github.io/gmx_MMPBSA/command-line/#running-gmx_mmpbsa>
.
Example: mpirun -np 8 gmx_MMPBSA MPI -O ...
It is difficult to know. Assuming that the 53765 atoms correspond to
protein (the water molecules are not taken into account in the calculation
since it is an implicit solvent, nor the ions) and using about 8 CPU it
should take between 1-3 hours approximately
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#46 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUOPBA3OMUH2NNM7X2KLATLTTBHLHANCNFSM46SBRNJA>
.
|
Did you define the If you only calculate the ΔG effective, this term is named HTH! |
Just restarted with interaction_entropy = 1.
…On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 1:43 PM Mario Sergio Valdés Tresanco < ***@***.***> wrote:
Did you define the interaction_entropy = 1 or entropy = 2 (deprecated)
variable?
The ΔG binding is calculated only if some entropy term was defined.
You can modify the _GMXMMPBSA_info file (only the interaction_entropy
variable) to calculate it with gmx_MMPBSA_ana without run the calculation
again
If you only calculate the ΔG *effective*, this term is named DELTA TOTAL
and correspond to the ΔH value
HTH!
Mario S.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#46 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUOPBA2X5AT3G27JO3PL4G3TTBMLJANCNFSM46SBRNJA>
.
|
Note that the representation, as the value of the Interaction entropy contribution can vary with the number of frames. For more information, consult the documentation, where you can find related articles. Best regards |
Sorry, I completely forgot that the issue was related to To better track other types of bugs, please open a new issue. |
I am currently running a test system. I will update you.
Thanks,.
Suman.
…On Wed 16 Jun, 2021, 7:57 PM Mario Sergio Valdés Tresanco, < ***@***.***> wrote:
Note that the representation, as the value of the Interaction entropy
contribution can vary with the number of frames. For more information,
consult the documentation
<https://valdes-tresanco-ms.github.io/gmx_MMPBSA/introduction/>, where
you can find related articles.
As the initial issue was solved, I will close it. Feel free to open
another one if necessary. Also, consult our group
<https://groups.google.com/g/gmx_mmpbsa>.
Best regards
Mario S.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#46 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUOPBA4AN7GBNTQYAHZ25S3TTCYDZANCNFSM46SBRNJA>
.
|
Hi,
The results are quite surprising. The DelG-binding comes in positive value.
The complex is a crystal structure and is supposed to be highly stable and
thus negative. I am pasting the results here:
Kindly let me know if I am missing something here.
...............................................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................................................
| Run on Wed Jun 16 20:01:42 2021
|
|Input file:
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|Sample input file for PB calculation
|This input file is meant to show only that gmx_MMPBSA works. Althought,
|we tried to used the input files as recommended in the Amber manual,
|some parameters have been changed to perform more expensive calculations
|in a reasonable amount of time. Feel free to change the parameters
|according to what is better for your system.
|
|&general
|startframe=30, endframe=50, verbose=2, interaction_entropy = 1,
|/
|&pb
|# radiopt=0 is recommended which means using radii from the prmtop file
|# for both the PB calculation and for the NP calculation
|
|istrng=0.15, fillratio=4.0, radiopt=0
|/
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|gmx_MMPBSA Version=v1.4.3 based on MMPBSA.py v.16.0
|Complex topology file: COM.prmtop
|Receptor topology file: REC.prmtop
|Ligand topology file: LIG.prmtop
|Initial mdcrd(s): COM_traj_0.xtc
|
|Receptor mask: ":1-347"
|Ligand mask: ":348-386"
|
|Calculations performed using 21 complex frames.
|Interaction Entropy calculations performed using last 6 frames.
|Poisson Boltzmann calculations performed using internal PBSA solver in
sander.
|
|All units are reported in kcal/mole.
|All entropy results have units kcal/mol
(Temperature for NMODE and QH is 298.15 K)
(Temperature for IE is 298.15 K)
…-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ENTROPY RESULTS (INTERACTION ENTROPY):
Entropy Term Average Std. Dev. Std. Err. of
Mean
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IE 57.5955 0.0550
0.0224
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
POISSON BOLTZMANN:
Complex:
Energy Component Average Std. Dev. Std. Err. of
Mean
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOND 1263.2076 31.7220
6.9223
ANGLE 3039.6469 50.9278
11.1134
DIHED 3916.5078 22.7862
4.9724
UB 379.9472 10.7311
2.3417
IMP 213.9889 7.7140
1.6833
CMAP -163.6825 12.3151
2.6874
VDWAALS -2650.7345 19.9520
4.3539
EEL -25887.2207 95.7047
20.8845
1-4 VDW 1149.0130 13.5755
2.9624
1-4 EEL 18413.4966 56.4955
12.3283
EPB -4643.3859 81.5059
17.7860
ENPOLAR 3012.9285 8.3984
1.8327
EDISPER -1673.1287 11.8814
2.5927
G gas -325.8297 123.5707
26.9653
G solv -3303.5861 85.6623
18.6930
TOTAL -3629.4158 100.7725
21.9904
Receptor:
Energy Component Average Std. Dev. Std. Err. of
Mean
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOND 1144.8716 29.8224
6.5078
ANGLE 2744.1276 46.1043
10.0608
DIHED 3583.1902 21.9916
4.7990
UB 344.2304 10.7252
2.3404
IMP 193.6893 8.5836
1.8731
CMAP -161.1233 11.6012
2.5316
VDWAALS -2343.8451 17.8744
3.9005
EEL -23297.4376 76.3510
16.6612
1-4 VDW 1065.3130 13.4171
2.9279
1-4 EEL 16517.8633 52.2190
11.3951
EPB -4458.6220 65.8003
14.3588
ENPOLAR 2776.5318 7.3051
1.5941
EDISPER -1606.3771 9.8293
2.1449
G gas -209.1206 105.2649
22.9707
G solv -3288.4673 68.0261
14.8445
TOTAL -3497.5879 93.4050
20.3826
Ligand:
Energy Component Average Std. Dev. Std. Err. of
Mean
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOND 118.3359 5.3979
1.1779
ANGLE 295.5193 13.5738
2.9620
DIHED 333.3175 6.8565
1.4962
UB 35.7168 2.0342
0.4439
IMP 20.2996 3.2170
0.7020
CMAP -2.5592 5.6748
1.2383
VDWAALS -139.1172 4.1061
0.8960
EEL -2269.4737 35.5773
7.7636
1-4 VDW 83.7000 3.9234
0.8562
1-4 EEL 1895.6333 27.2963
5.9565
EPB -554.4901 17.1292
3.7379
ENPOLAR 363.5139 2.4338
0.5311
EDISPER -298.9073 2.1147
0.4615
G gas 371.3723 27.1934
5.9341
G solv -489.8835 17.1117
3.7341
TOTAL -118.5112 18.1647
3.9639
Differences (Complex - Receptor - Ligand):
Energy Component Average Std. Dev. Std. Err. of
Mean
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BOND 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
ANGLE 0.0000 0.0001
0.0000
DIHED -0.0000 0.0001
0.0000
UB -0.0000 0.0001
0.0000
IMP 0.0000 0.0001
0.0000
CMAP -0.0000 0.0001
0.0000
VDWAALS -167.7721 4.8959
1.0684
EEL -320.3093 28.3678
6.1904
1-4 VDW 0.0000 0.0001
0.0000
1-4 EEL 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000
EPB 369.7262 23.8134
5.1965
ENPOLAR -127.1172 3.8182
0.8332
EDISPER 232.1557 5.2522
1.1461
DELTA G gas -488.0814 28.4023
6.1979
DELTA G solv 474.7647 25.0049
5.4565
DELTA TOTAL -13.3167 9.8082
2.1403
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Interaction Entropy Approximation:
DELTA G binding = 44.2788 +/- 9.8084
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 8:42 PM Sinha Suman ***@***.***> wrote:
I am currently running a test system. I will update you.
Thanks,.
Suman.
On Wed 16 Jun, 2021, 7:57 PM Mario Sergio Valdés Tresanco, <
***@***.***> wrote:
> Note that the representation, as the value of the Interaction entropy
> contribution can vary with the number of frames. For more information,
> consult the documentation
> <https://valdes-tresanco-ms.github.io/gmx_MMPBSA/introduction/>, where
> you can find related articles.
> As the initial issue was solved, I will close it. Feel free to open
> another one if necessary. Also, consult our group
> <https://groups.google.com/g/gmx_mmpbsa>.
>
> Best regards
> Mario S.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#46 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AUOPBA4AN7GBNTQYAHZ25S3TTCYDZANCNFSM46SBRNJA>
> .
>
|
Hello there! there are few things that I would like to point out about your results. 1- first thing first, gmx_MMPBSA works (which means it can process your files and give you a result). Now it's time to see what could be going wrong hope this helps! Mario E |
Describe the issue
Installed the program gmx_MMPBSA with amber.python and also installed other dependencies as mentioned in program website. All path is set as instructed.
A clear and concise description of what the issue is.
If you will report an error, please complete this form
Installing collected packages: seaborn, mpi4py, gmx-MMPBSA
WARNING: The scripts gmx_MMPBSA, gmx_MMPBSA_ana and gmx_MMPBSA_test are installed in '/home/ssinha/.local/bin' which is not on PATH.
Consider adding this directory to PATH or, if you prefer to suppress this warning, use --no-warn-script-location.
Successfully installed gmx-MMPBSA-1.4.3 mpi4py-3.0.3 seaborn-0.11.1
(base) ssinha@susi:~/Desktop$ gmx_MMPBSA
[INFO ] Starting
[INFO ] Command-line
gmx_MMPBSA
InputError: No input file was provided!
Enter
gmx_MMPBSA --help
for help(base) ssinha@susi:
/Desktop$ gmx_MMPBSA/Desktop$ gmx_MMPBSAgmx_MMPBSA gmx_MMPBSA_ana gmx_MMPBSA_test
(base) ssinha@susi:
gmx_MMPBSA gmx_MMPBSA_ana gmx_MMPBSA_test
(base) ssinha@susi:~/Desktop$ gmx_MMPBSA_test
[INFO ] Cloning gmx_MMPBSA repository in gmx_MMPBSA_test
Cloning into 'gmx_MMPBSA_test'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 6224, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (1581/1581), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (527/527), done.
remote: Total 6224 (delta 1068), reused 1381 (delta 910), pack-reused 4643
Receiving objects: 100% (6224/6224), 255.69 MiB | 7.44 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (4390/4390), done.
Updating files: 100% (364/364), done.
[INFO ] Cloning gmx_MMPBSA repository...Done.
[INFO ] Example STATE
[INFO ] Protein-Ligand (Single trajectory approximation) RUNNING
[INFO ] Protein-Protein RUNNING
[INFO ] Protein-Ligand (Single trajectory approximation) [ 1/12] DONE
[INFO ] Protein-DNA RUNNING
multiprocessing.pool.RemoteTraceback:
"""
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ssinha/amber20/miniconda/lib/python3.8/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 125, in worker
result = (True, func(*args, **kwds))
File "/home/ssinha/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/GMXMMPBSA/tester.py", line 29, in calculatestar
return run_process(*args)
File "/home/ssinha/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/GMXMMPBSA/tester.py", line 33, in run_process
os.chdir(system[0])
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'gmx_MMPBSA_test/docs/examples/Protein_protein'
"""
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ssinha/.local/bin/gmx_MMPBSA_test", line 8, in
sys.exit(gmxmmpbsa_test())
File "/home/ssinha/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/GMXMMPBSA/app.py", line 146, in gmxmmpbsa_test
run_test(parser)
File "/home/ssinha/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/GMXMMPBSA/tester.py", line 132, in run_test
for x in imap_unordered_it:
File "/home/ssinha/amber20/miniconda/lib/python3.8/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 868, in next
raise value
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'gmx_MMPBSA_test/docs/examples/Protein_protein'
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Plz help
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: