Dire Climate Forecast Includes the 100-Year Flood, Once a Decade

graphicA depiction of the 100-year flood zone in Lower Manhattan shows landmarks and infrastructure that could be frequently flooded in the future unless they are protected. (Graphic: Applied Science Associates Inc.; Sources: Google/Sanborn)

Floods that happen every 100 years could come as often as every 10 years by the end of this century, Long Island lobsters will disappear and New York apples will be just a memory if nothing is done to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, according to a new report by the Union of Concerned Scientists.

The report was released at the New York Botanical Garden in the Bronx this morning, in the wake of several days of intense heat, of the kind that scientists warned could come more frequently if business continues as usual. James L. McCarthy, professor of biological oceanography at Harvard and president-elect of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, predicted that New York City might have to swelter through a full month with temperatures above 100 degrees. Prolonged heat could dry up the Catskill Mountains’ waters that supply the city, the report says, and air quality could decline, worsening conditions for people with asthma and allergies.

Seasonal changes, like earlier springs, longer summers and less-snowy winters, are already being seen are the result of heat-trapping gases released over the last century. But scientists said things would become far worse, and much more costly, unless steps are taken now to mitigate the impact.

The report is part of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment, which its Web site describes as

a collaboration between the Union of Concerned Scientists and a team of independent experts using state-of-the-art tools to assess how global warming will affect the Northeast under two different scenarios: a higher emissions path with continued rapid growth in global warming pollution, and a lower emissions path with greatly reduced heat trapping emissions.

The eight-page report for New York [pdf] has a map showing wide swaths of the city that would be at greater risk for flooding. The New York report finds that “critical transportation infrastructure located in the Battery could be flooded far more frequently unless protected.”

Without reductions in emissions, sea levels could rise, inundating coastal areas on southern Long Island and pushing water over parts of lower Manhattan, flooding the financial district and pouring water into the subways, making them inoperable, according to the report.

Long Island lobsters would move to cooler waters up north, and without a hard frost to set buds, New York apple trees would not produce as much fruit as before. Under stress from the invasive species, maple beech and birch trees could disappear from certain regions of the state, including the Adirondacks. And since it would often be hotter than dairy cows find to be comfortable, milk production could decline by 15 percent or more in late summer months.

Rohit T. Aggarwala, New York City’s director of long-term planning and stability, said the report adds to “the growing stack of information and rigorous analysis that proves that the debate over climate change is over, and the time for action is now.”

Mr. Aggarwala said that New York City has already taken some steps that will position it to compete on a worldwide basis in the effort to control global warming. He said those efforts range from relatively simple ones, like promoting the use of compact fluorescent bulbs and converting the city’s taxi fleet to hybrid vehicles, to long-range strategic initiatives like congestion pricing.

The report did not include any analysis of the cost to consumers and industry of various efforts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. But Mr. Aggarwala said it is wrong to think that doing such planning always has a negative cost.

“Many of the things we can and must be doing will pay off because they make the city a better place to live,” he said. “They make New York City more efficient, more effective and more competitive not only around the country but around the world.”

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Could build a lot of dikes to protect lower Manhattan with $500 million the feds want to shovel to Bloomberg’s Wall Street buddies owning or underwriting companies which will make fortunes enforcing congestion fees.

Mel Brooks left this skit off his classic “Thousand Year Old Man” record. “Vell, I remember how upset people vere in Iova when word came the woolly mammoths would disappear with the of the ice age. Vat, we’ll have to go to work as farmers. So much easily sitting around for veeks munching on mammoth!”

My observations during a July 4th weekend in Montauk:

-The number of people driving SUVs and other truck-like objects seems to have actually increased.

-The size of said SUVs seems to have increased.

-The number of people idling their vehicles for extended periods – to keep the AC and/or CD going, I would imagine – seems to have increased.

Is it me – or are people so incredibly stupid and selfish that all the talk of global warming and its consequences have little or no affect? Whatever the case may be, it’s very frightening. It seems that Americans are h*ll-bent on destroying whatever is left of our environment. Maybe Kurt Vonnegut was right. Maybe was just don’t like it here.

It is rather amazing that the false economic arguments that suggest that we will prosper better with less regulation and disfavoring tilting the economy toward responding to environmental concerns has so far been able to win the day in the public market for ideas. One hopes that this report will shift that a bit, and perhaps be the “tipping point.” I am not holding my breath, but because of reports like this, and their coverage in this press organ, I can remain an optimist.

This is silly, it would be easy enough to build floodwalls around whatever areas of Manhattan needed it. Manhattan happens to be the most densely populated place in the U.S., and NYC the largest, most important city, so it would be saved at any cost. The people who should really worry are everyone living near any coast who aren’t in NYC. Also anyone living near large rivers or downstream from dams. NYC will be just fine, although many many others will probably be washed away, including all of Bangladesh for example.

it’s not just the size of vehicles and random idling, as noted by the poster above. it’s drive-thru everything. (In Texas they have drive-through liquor stores. I am not making this up.) I am always dumbfounded to see people sitting in a 10-minute drive thru line when there’s no wait inside at the counter. A lot of this behavior does genuinely baffle me, but then again I approved when the speed limit on interstate highways was dropped to 55.

Expecting people to voluntarily conserve energy is naive. I drive a big SUV because I enjoy the convenience. I would also support a doubling or tripling of the gas tax in order to reduce general gas use and fund the research of alternative energies.

And so it remains the same; The Malthusians are correct once more.

Listening to comments on idling cars, I wonder why all cars can’t be fitted out like my hybrid, with and engine that quits when you stop at a light and starts when you begin driving?

What is more convenient about your SUV than say a station wagon?

“earlier springs, longer summers and less-snowy winters”

??? I must live in some other NYC. And I also like the balance in the article. Oh sorry, there is no balance on this subject. Either you believe it, or you’re evil.

Guess all of you are real smart for living there and the people in New Orleans are all stupid. Good luck getting the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to help you out by then.

Is that vain lunatic Sheldon Silver reading this report?

Long before human beings existed, Earth’s history was one of freezing cold and searing heat. This is just the work of another special interest group taking advantage of a few hot summer days to advance their agenda.

Throughout human history individuals and groups like the Union of Concerned Scientists have sought to gain power over communities by claiming to control inherently unpredictable systems like the weather. Now they are turning science into political theater. Frankly, it is just sad.

Let it be noted that the flood walls in New Orleans became deadly traps for the people there once the floods provided by nature exceeded the engineering provided by man.

Why is it that in all the discussion over global changes that population is never part of the discussion?

It’s no mystery why there are more houses, roads, SUVs and when you look at the numbers. There are more than twice as many people in the world now than in 1950 (and, yes, twice as many in the US, too, not all developing countries). But somehow, having an honest discussion on peopling the world is always seen as a negative.

We continue forward implementing a land-use development plan that was conceived when the country had half as many people! Whether you’re in Boston, New York or New Orleans (all of which are built on landfill with a substantial part of the land at or below sea level), I guess we deserve what we get — unless someone can redefine the “American dream”.

I would miss New York apples. Wouldn’t mind New York peaches or citrus, though!

I’m not sure I understand the why everyone gets their panties in a bunch about man-induced global warming and the ineveitability its consequences.

Where does it say that what we’ve been doing to the world we populate won’t…well, end the world we populate. Clearly humanity — first, second and third worlds — doesn’t care aside from modist symbolic gestures days later forgotten. We are the ultimate self indulgent species, which has been, in part, why we’ve been so successful. Writ large, however, self indulgence (actually on any scale) ends poorly. Our collective behavior has run countless thousands of other animal species to ground: Why can’t we accept we are and will continue doing the same to our own. We do it in every way of which we can think. People of justify or find comfort in thinking and saying “Science and technology will save us.” Or maybe the tooth fairy will.

Can’t we simply accept that there is no credible evidence that the human race is destined to last forever? Every thing changes and nothing lasts forever. We are what we are and we‘ve shown no signs of changing asside from evolution, which no longer has time to work things out for us. That’s the way of nature. As T.S. Elliot wrote, “Out with a Whimper, Not with a Bang.”

Q: the good news?
A: Canadian land values are gonna spike as people start panicking

Q: the bad news?
A: I don’t have a real estate license

thebigmancat is right. it’s not just Long Island, it’s everywhere. you see so many people alone in behemoths, driving aimlessly or driving to get a cup of coffee. if you have nothing to do, don’t drive, pick up a book made on paper from sequestered carbon and stay at home w/the windows open and read. and stop having so many children while you’re at it too!

The one for Connecticut looks as dire; The folly of this report is not the information, but the ‘hope’ that we will be able to stop the worse case scenario.

I doubt it- people continue to use energy like drug addicts. Up here east of Hartford I see more big SUV’s trucks and large cars then hybrids believe me.

I frankly think the window of time is decreasing ever so tightly shut (another 5-10 years) In fact it may be too late now to even stop the ‘lower emissions’ scenario by the Union of Concerned Scientists.

It will probably take a world wide event of several catastrophes- massive hurricanes, deadly droughts and heat, and famine before the people begin to wake up in the USA- and by that time it will matter little.

not a single scientist can explain whether or not “man-made” global warming will produce more clouds or less clouds.

not a single scientist can explain why sea levels haven’t risen in over 50yrs.

SIR OGRE OF THE HOUSE OF ORANGE July 15, 2007 · 5:23 pm

HARRUMPH~

Science is riddled with FOOLS, especially those who pushing a political agenda!

I still remember when Mt St Helens blew that the forecasts were total devastation for decades, if not for a whole century.

And yet, within a week they found weeds, fish, animals and evergreen seedlings flourishing.

The biggest lie is what happens when all the ice at the poles melt. First off, its happened before in history, that sailing ships were able to cross the Arctic Circle.

Second, take a measuring cup and fill it with ice. Then add water so the ice barely floats. Watch what happens after the ice has totally melted. Did it overflow the cup?

Finally, look at the benefits of going through a passing climate change. Not only will agriculture benefit to the north, but Canada can become a greater producer of oil sands and reduce our need for Middle East DEVILS GOLD. Giving US more time to return to safer nuclear resources that have HYDROGEN as a byproduct, and hydropower projects.

Personally, I dont understand why the USPS hasnt switched over to Propane or LNG, or just electrical for their mail delivery.
But, then I also wish they would do it at night, so as to reduce crime because people are out there walking a route.

SIGH…

ADDENDUM~

Regarding barriers to keep the rising tide out:

During one of the Mississippi flooding cycles, there was a farmer who invited the media to his home, which was surrounded by a tall dike and therefore not flooded, unlike his surrounding farmland.

While there, they were witness to an unexpected solution MOTHER NATURE had for reclaiming ALL her land.

Seems the sewer drain lines ruptured and the flood came in using the tub and toilet, and eventually, the other drains in the house.

But, there is a bright spot in this FLOODING of NY:
The GROUND ZERO chaos over a rebuilding will come to an end.

/Harrumph!

I strongly believe that people who own large SUVs, especially luxury ones, really don’t need them. Instead of being a status symbol, they are rather a stupidity and arrogance symbol. Just to show that they can afford paying the gas. Where is the convenience in that? Are people carrying their household with them? Two years ago, when global warming became clear , I junked my 8 cylinder car and got a 4 cylinder one. Just like the guys who own luxury homes on Cape Cod, who opposed wind turbines off shore. Well guys, soon your luxury homes will become luxury swimming pools.

Response to #15 and the one who commented about water expansion.

heat the same cup a water slowly in it expands if water does not give off as steam.

water is one of the few elements in nature that expands in both hot and cold temperatures. that I know of.

The reason we don’t see this when we boil water is that it changes to steam thus when we go to measure it is at the same level or lower due to evaporation.

Dikes around new york won’t happen for the simple fact waster will find its way in in one form or other.

ever consider where your going to get your water from when the Saline acidic water starts to seep into the underground aquifers?

Population is the biggest of the issues but its not talked about because of the human rights issue of forced birth control. which we have decreed a human right to breed. Only way to control population is a mandatory breeding limit like china has and enforce it by either abortions or prison for the parents when exceeding the limit which would stay in prison the child’s full life and only be released if the child died.

Other option is Genocide. now do you see why the population is not talked about it would upset almost every ligious group on earth. Especially the pro-lifers.